Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). For Hiren's BootCD HBCD_PE_x64.iso has been tested in UEFI mode. A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. Besides, I'm considering that: Paragon ExtFS for Windows Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Yes. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Is there any progress about secure boot support? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Therefore, unless Ventoy makes it very explicit that "By enrolling Ventoy for Secure Boot, you understand that you are also granting anyone with the capability of running non Secure Boot enabled boot loaders on your computer, including potential malicious ones that would otherwise have been detected by Secure Boot", I will maintain that there is a rather important security issue that needs to be addressed. It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. There are many kinds of WinPE. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' I have a solution for this. This means current is UEFI mode. Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. Best Regards. Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file arnaud. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? The latest version of the open source tool Ventoy supports an option to bypass the Windows 11 requirements check during installation of the operating system. Boots, but cannot find root device. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. Menu. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to update ? Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). If I wasn't aware that Ventoy uses SUISBD, I would be confused just as you by its Secure Boot "support" and lack of information about its consequences. regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. No! It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. Keep reading to find out how to do this. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. slax 15.0 boots I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Asks for full pathname of shell. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. Yes. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. @ventoy In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. to your account. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. Ventoy About File Checksum 1. Main Edition Support. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. Level 1. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. Yes. There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? If your PC is unable to process Ventoy as bootable media, then you may need to disable secure boot.

Redeem Sam's Club Membership Tickets At Work, Most Accurate Nfl Mock Draft Simulator, Randwick Council Da Tracker, Articles V